Stop Chasing Skills. Start Developing Taste.
Every few months, the internet collectively panics about which creative skill is about to become obsolete. Coding. Copywriting. Illustration. Design. The anxiety is understandable — the pace of technological change is genuinely disorienting, and the tools eating into traditionally human work are getting better at a rate that's hard to process.
But here's what I think we're getting wrong: we keep framing the conversation around skills, when the real differentiator has always been something harder to quantify and far more durable.
Taste.
Not taste in the snobbish, gatekeeping sense. Not the kind of taste that tells other people their work is bad. I mean taste as a generative force — the cultivated ability to recognize what's exceptional, to understand why it works, and to assemble those insights into a point of view so distinctive that your work is immediately, unmistakably yours.
That kind of taste is what separates innovators from imitators. And right now, in 2025, it might be the most underrated skill in the entire creative economy.
What Taste Actually Is (And Isn't)
Let's be precise about this, because the word gets misused constantly.
Taste isn't preference. Saying you prefer minimalist design to maximalist design isn't taste — it's a setting. Taste is the ability to look at two minimalist designs and immediately know which one is doing something real and which one is just following a trend. Taste is knowing why one album cover from 1977 still looks modern and another from the same year looks dated. Taste is the internal compass that tells you when a product is almost right but not quite, and — crucially — what would close the gap.
Ira Glass, the host and creator of This American Life, gave a now-legendary interview about what he called "the taste gap" — the painful period early in a creative career when your taste is already excellent but your execution hasn't caught up. His point was that taste comes first. It develops through deep, intentional consumption of great work. And without it, even the most technically proficient creators produce work that feels generic.
The inverse is also true: when taste is highly developed, even technically imperfect work can feel compelling, original, and alive.
Why This Moment Demands It More Than Ever
Here's the uncomfortable reality about the current creative landscape: technical execution is being democratized at warp speed. Software is more powerful and accessible than ever. AI tools are closing skill gaps that used to take years to bridge. The barrier to entry for producing competent work in almost any creative field has dropped dramatically.
What that means is that competence is no longer a competitive advantage. Competence is table stakes.
What can't be automated — at least not yet, and arguably not ever in any meaningful sense — is a genuine point of view. The ability to look at culture, absorb it deeply, and produce something that reflects a specific, authentic perspective. The ability to curate, to edit, to make the call on what matters and what doesn't.
That's taste. And it's becoming the primary differentiator between creative professionals who are thriving and those who are grinding.
Taste Is Built, Not Born
This is where the conversation usually goes sideways. People hear "taste" and assume it's either innate or inaccessible — something you either have or you don't, shaped by upbringing, education, or some ineffable quality of perception.
That's wrong. Taste is a practice. It's developed through intentional, active engagement with exceptional work across disciplines.
The key word is intentional. Passive consumption — scrolling Instagram, watching Netflix, absorbing the ambient culture of your feed — doesn't build taste. It just reflects it back at you. What builds taste is the act of interrogating what you encounter. Asking not just whether you like something, but why. What specific choices produced this effect? What would happen if one element were changed? Why does this feel inevitable while that feels arbitrary?
The most creatively sharp people I've encountered share a common habit: they consume widely and across disciplines. The product designer who reads literary fiction. The copywriter who studies architecture. The musician who is obsessed with mid-century industrial design. Cross-disciplinary consumption is taste fertilizer — it builds a reference library that most of your competitors simply don't have.
Building Your Aesthetic Practice
If taste is a practice, it needs structure. Here's what that can look like in real terms.
Curate ruthlessly, both in and out. Be deliberate about what you let into your visual and intellectual diet. Follow fewer people whose work you admire more deeply, rather than a broad feed of adequate work. Delete the accounts that are producing noise. Create space for signal.
Build a swipe file that actually makes you uncomfortable. Most creative professionals collect work that confirms their existing aesthetic. The more useful practice is to collect work that challenges it — things you don't fully understand yet, things from outside your discipline, things from different eras and cultures that operate by rules you haven't internalized yet.
Make taste decisions out loud. Write about what you're looking at. Talk to other people about it. The act of articulating why something works forces you to actually understand it rather than just feel it. This is how intuition becomes judgment.
Seek primary sources. Don't just consume the discourse around great work — go to the work itself. Read the original. Visit the museum. Listen to the record without reading the review first. Intermediated experience of art and design is useful, but it's no substitute for direct encounter.
The Boldest Move You Can Make
In a creative economy that rewards speed, volume, and technical proficiency, choosing to invest seriously in taste is actually a countercultural act. It's slow work. It doesn't produce immediate, measurable outputs. It's hard to put on a resume.
But it compounds. Every great painting you study, every piece of architecture you interrogate, every album you listen to with full attention — it all goes into a reservoir that your creative work draws from whether you're conscious of it or not.
The people building the most interesting things right now — the founders, designers, writers, and makers who are genuinely moving culture — aren't just more skilled than their peers. They see differently. They've done the work of developing a perspective so specific and so deeply informed that their output is immediately recognizable.
That's not talent. That's taste. And you can build it starting today.